But because it does, any incident where race is overlooked is taken as a stance against racism. Discrimination against African-Americans is present in the United States, and we can’t ignore this fact when it comes to assessing whether Obama’s victory is a big deal or not.

But since many African-Americans voted for him because of his race, they didn’t overlook the factor of race. They just used it in the opposite direction.

All this emphasis shows I was wrong. It’s not for granted.

Sad. People still do not think. Change has come. If you ask WHAT change, people blank out.

I tell you what’s the change: more regulation and more government spending.

Obama’s victory in the presidential elections will no doubt change the United State’s political landscape. On its own, it offers two benefits:

1- Greater participation of the African-American community in US politics

2- Changing the negative stereotypes about African-Americans

However, these aren’t sufficient reasons to vote for a presidential candidate. It’s like voting for Hillary because she’s a woman, while overlooking her views on the economy, foreign affairs, etc.

Obama could turn out to be a great president (which I highly doubt, given his socialist leanings), but when it comes to voting, we should know what we’re voting for, not what we’re hoping to vote for.

مقال جميل

فعلا

صدقت عندما قلت السياسة لا تؤمن بالكلماتالتي ستخدمها اصحابها
لان السبيل والملاذ الوحيد منها هي الوصول

لا استطيع ان اجمع الكل
ولكن الاغلب

هذا واقع مرير
ولكن التغيير في الحكومة الامريكية
لن يشمل اكثر من انه سيكون باراك اوباما حد الرؤساء الامريكيين من السود

وستظل في التاريخ كالمسمار للسياسيين لحصد اصواتهم

لكل قاعدة شواذ وربما الرئيس الامريكي الجديد يكون غير

دمت بخير